|
A formal proposal is required for admission to a research degree. It is one
means by which university committees assess and approve your research candidature.
The process of developing the proposal can be a valuable exercise, one which
can help you determine your focus, clarify what is involved in your research
project and plan its development. A developed proposal is an important way in
which you can demonstrate your understanding of research and communicate your
‘research thinking’ to others.
These guidelines are provided to help you draw out your ideas. They state the
requirements of a sound proposal.
1 Topic and problematic
The research topic formulates a problem that is worthy of research. The topic
should:
-
be stated clearly and succinctly in one or two sentences.
- be determined after consultation with potential supervisors.
The topic is usually framed as a ‘problem’ or question in need of
an answer. The topic statement will invite your reader to ask why it is significant
and ‘worth doing’. A good research proposal identifies in the research
topic a ‘problematic’ to be investigated. Needless to say, your
statement of this will result from discussion of your area of interest with
potential supervisors, mentors and others.
Framing the question is not always easy, and you need to ask yourself whether
your proposed ‘problem’ or ‘research question’ is really
the question to be asked and answered. The framing of the problematic is crucial
in setting up the research, though it is a common for researchers to revise
and reformulate this as the research progresses.
An important issue is how you theorise or conceptualise the topic—what
needs to come through is your understanding of the problematic you are exploring.
2 Background and context
Your research topic needs to be located in its context and background. In sketching
this background, you need to show how and why does the topic come to be important
and why is it worth researching? This means:
- contextualising the research problem—how does it arise?
- outlining its significance—what will be the outcomes, and for
whom?
- referring to key issues that are associated with the topic
Background can be provided in several ways. Your theoretical interests or concerns
may have generated the research, and its justification is to be found in a theoretical
developments or related literature. Where professional practice is the focus,
you may want to describe and analyse the context of policy or organisational
changes.
In any case, you should summarise the influences which come into play to shape
your research. The analysis should lead you to interrogate your own assumptions
about why the problem is significant. You need to ask what interests are driving
the research, from whose point of view the problem is ‘significant’?
3 Conceptual framework and related literature
A conceptual framework elaborates the research problematic in relation to relevant
literature. It should deal with such matters as:
- existing research and its relevance for your topic
- relevant theoretical perspective or perspectives
- key ideas or constructs in your approach
- possible lines of inquiry you might pursue
Your proposal needs to show how the proposed research relates to a body of related
studies, or literature. The orthodox way to do this is to write a brief version
of the literature review on a traditional science model. This is not always
possible, especially if there is little related past research. Another is to
outline the kinds of theoretical sources that will inform your research—the
available research perspectives.
Though not all proposals need to include an elaborated conceptual framework,
a well-developed proposal will do so. This can take up so-called ‘conceptual
issues’ which express your understanding of the topic and the problems
in researching it.
4 Methodology and ethics
Methodology put simply is the research methods you intend to develop or employ
and their justification. It is more than a description of the techniques or
procedures proposed, and should outline the key assumptions your approach makes.
It may foreshadow some of the ‘methodological issues’ which you
anticipate will arise in developing your research approach.
How you describe your methodology will depend on what kind of approach you are
taking. The methodology section typically might:
- refer to a accepted method or approach
- highlight problems in developing a suitable approach (methodological
issues)
- describe how information will be generated, analysed and reported
- document ethical issues in view of UTS Ethics Committee requirements
(see the guidelines on ethics included in this handbook)
If you plan a quantitative study, you will refer to method, data collection
and analysis. Qualitative methodology will need to describe issues in managing
qualitative data. An action research methodology needs to be described in terms
of planning a process and the outcomes of different phases of the process, and
so on.
5 Research plan and timeline
An important part of the proposal is planning the research in all its stages
up to completion. Your plan should specify what tasks you will complete at each
stage – literature review, research framework, description of method,
writing up of findings and conclusions and so on. These tasks should specify
what writing tasks will be accomplished and when. It is helpful to:
- diagram the research as a semester by semester timeline
- state semester writing objectives for each semester
- state other outcomes at a given stage, such as seminar or conference
papers
- allow a semester for revising the thesis
You do not have an indefinite amount of time to complete the degree. Plan to
complete in the minimum time, and plan how you will achieve this. A suggested
way to describe the timeline is shown on the attached planner.
6 Writing
Thesis preparation is a challenging writing task. It will be helpful for you
to specify what writing outcomes there will be at each stage. The Faculty encourages
students to understand their research in terms of scholarly writing, whether
or not field research is involved. Early completion is more likely if the thesis
develops through specific writing commitments including short papers which may
be presented at seminars and conferences. UTS requires doctoral candidates complete
a doctoral assessment seminar (see guidelines elsewhere in this handbook).
7 Research Timeline
The following illustrates how a research degree thesis might be planned over
six semesters:
|
Time
|
Research stage
|
Writing/ Reporting
|
|
Semester 1
|
Proposal developed
|
Proposal. Paper on the thesis argument. Thesis outline.
|
|
Semester 2
|
Reading of literature. Negotiate access to field
|
Short papers on rationale & conceptual framework, review of literature.
|
|
Semester 3
|
Field research: develop and pilot procedures. Database development
|
Draft methodology chapter. Trial write-up of selected material. Re-work conceptual chapter.
|
|
Semester 4
|
Field research: finalise procedures and complete.
|
Short papers on field research. Write up research procedures.
|
|
Semester 5
|
Analysis
|
Draft analysis chapter. Prepare conference paper. Draft conclusions.
|
|
Semester 6
|
Revision of thesis
|
Final chapter. Revise and refine thesis structure. Seminar or conference paper.
|
|
Semester 7
|
Submission and examination
|
Final revisions. Journal article.
|
Note:
The research proposal which is submitted with an application
is used primarily for making a decision about admission. It is not expected
that this will be definitive or final. After commencing a research degree, it
is normal for research proposals to be modified as a result of further study
and investigation, sometimes in substantial ways.
Next: Assessment Guidelines
|